'Total Loss Protection' at Center of NY Dealer's $298K Settlement With State AG
The office of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced that Nissan of New Rochelle will pay $298,211 in restitution, penalties and fees to settle claims the dealership charged hundreds of car buyers thousands of dollars for an ‘unwanted and bogus’ theft-deterrent product.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced that Nissan of New Rochelle will pay $298,000 in restitution and penalties to settle charges relating to the dealership’s “Total Loss Protection” theft-deterrent program. Photo courtesy New York State Office of the Attorney General
ALBANY, N.Y. — Nissan of New Rochelle will pay more than $298,000 to settle claims that the dealership willfully defrauded 298 car buyers of a total of $276,127 by tacking on a window-etch program that included a “Total Loss Protection” benefit after customers had agreed to a price for the vehicle and often without their knowledge or consent, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced this week.
In addition to refunding the cost of the product, which varied from $215 to more than $5,000 per vehicle, the dealership’s owners have agreed to pay the state $22,084 in penalties, fees and costs. They also agreed to “certain reforms” of the dealership’s sales and F& processes.
"Consumers should not have to worry that they are being scammed into adding on bogus products and services when they purchase a car,” Schneiderman said. “Buying a car is already a major investment for many families, and tacking on thousands of dollars extra can become a significant financial burden. I am pleased that we are able to return hundreds of thousands of dollars in restitution to the nearly 300 consumers who were scammed and defrauded.”
According to Schneiderman, his office’s investigation into the 2015 complaint revealed that the product, described as a window- and windshield-etch program backed by a $3,000 or $5,000 guarantee against theft, was deceptive or outright fraudulent on at least three counts — tacking on the cost of the product without customers’ knowledge being one of them.
The regulator also charged that conditions and limitations related to the guarantee made it “essentially worthless.” The regulator noted that only one car buyer was issued credit under the program. The attorney general’s investigation also revealed that the “etching” of each vehicle’s VIN was actually a sticker affixed to the inside of a door or doorjam, and in many cases was not performed at all.
As part of the settlement, Nissan of New Rochelle’s directors have agreed to include full disclosures and explanations for each product and express consent on the car buyer’s part before any products can be added to the deal, according to the regulator’s statement.
Originally posted on F&I and Showroom
More Compliance

Dealer Ads and the FTC
The agency has made it clear in recent enforcement actions and warnings, in auto retail and other industries, that advertised prices must include all nonoptional costs to the consumer.
Read More →
AAMS Training and Mosaic Compliance Services Merge
The strategic combination is intended to expand technology-driven compliance solutions for the automotive industry.
Read More →
The Jurisprudence of Pricing
Legal concept helps makes sense of California’s recently passed version of the failed federal CARS legislation.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Enforcement Priorities
The upshot is don’t relax, because regulation indeed continues.
Read More →
June Is Automotive Service Professionals Month
Observance is opportunity to thank technicians for their crucial role in auto retail.
Read More →
Cox Automotive Releases Compliance Guide
New edition walks auto dealers through relevant regulations for 2025.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Retail Automotive
Administration’s plans should generally bode well for the industry.
Read More →
CARS Rule Update: 5th Circuit Oral Arguments Recap
In this video, Jim Ganther of Mosaic Compliance Services, recaps the key takeaways from the oral arguments in the critical CARS Rule case, including potential outcomes and what dealers should do to stay ahead of compliance changes.
Read More →
State of the CARS Rule, Part 3
The players in the automotive industry should coordinate their responses to this pending regulation.
Read More →
The Future of Car Dealer Documents
Where forms, documents, agreements and contracts could be in 50 years.
Read More →